Impunity dissolving around VP, says international human rights group
Sara Duterte finally charged over ‘grave threats’
A media statement by the
International Coalition for Human Rights in the Philippines (ICHRP)
on the impeachment trial of VP Sara Duterte
September 8, 2026
“Do
not worry about my security because I already spoke to someone. I
said, 'If I am killed, kill BBM, Liza Araneta, and Martin Romualdez.'
No joke, no joke.” – Nov 23, 2024
How could there have been
any doubt that this brazen statement by Vice President Sara Duterte
almost two years ago was most likely illegal? But it took until
August 2026 for the Department of Justice to say so, and for a
warrant of arrest to be issued on September 4. The Vice-President
faced court on September 5, failed in her bid to have the warrant of
arrest withdrawn or delayed, and instead paid bail (US$1,915 on each
charge), was fingerprinted and then released.
“The International
Coalition for Human Rights in the Philippines (ICHRP) welcomes the
long overdue charging of Vice President Duterte for her 2024 threats
to kill political opponents. This is another important step towards
ending the culture of impunity which is rampant in Filipino
society,” said Peter Murphy, ICHRP Chairperson.
VP Duterte is also charged
over these alleged grave threats in the ongoing impeachment trial in
the Senate. There, the penalty, if found guilty, would be blockage
in the 2028 presidential election. In a criminal trial, a guilty
verdict would mean up to six months imprisonment on each of the
three charges of grave threat.
Neither Sara Duterte nor
her three targets have been killed since November 2024. So these new
charges appear to be politically motivated, and the beneficiaries
would be the Marcos family. The criminal charges and the charges in
the impeachment trial are all of a package, and seem to show the
Marcos family maximising the political and judicial processes to
remove the Duterte family from any opportunity to take the
presidency at the 2028 election.
Despite the likely benefit
to the Marcos family in the short term, there can be no doubt that
effective legal accountability for Sara Duterte is both vital to
democracy and hugely popular in the Philippines.
Just as the International
Criminal Court trial of former President Rodrigo Duterte – set to
open on November 30 – is a warning to incumbent President Marcos Jr
and other senior officials, the impeachment in the Senate and now
these criminal charges against Sara Duterte are also a warning to
the Marcos family that they are not immune from accountability for
their own alleged plunder and violations of human rights. Marcos Jr
himself deserves condemnation for enabling the crimes of Sara
Duterte. It must be remembered that prior to the bitter breakup of
their dynastic team up in 2024, Duterte and Marcos Jr formed the
so-called “Uniteam” alliance for the 2022 Philippine elections.
The motivation for Sara
Duterte’s alleged grave threats has been already exposed in the
impeachment trial.
Her November 2024 outburst
was after midnight and outside a detention facility at the House of
Representatives, where her Chief of Staff, Ms Zuleika Lopez, was
being held for contempt. Lopez had written to the Commission of
Audit to tell them not to comply with a subpoena issued by the House
Committee on Good Governance and Public Accountability. This
committee was investigating the spending of discretionary and
intelligence funds by Sara Duterte as Secretary of the Department of
Education and as Vice-President. The total under investigation was
P612.5 million (US$9.77 million).
Whether the Vice-President
was infuriated or rattled by the sudden detention of her Chief of
Staff, she reacted with death threats against those she believed
were behind this detention.
At the impeachment trial,
the prosecution has slowly unraveled the story of those P612.5
million in relation to the charge of misuse, misappropriation and
irregular liquidation of public funds. Only Sara Duterte and a
Colonel Raymund Lachica know how the P500 million of her funds as
Vice-President were spent, and Gina Acosta and Edward Fajarda were
given the P112.5 million in cash to disburse. The Commission on
Audit had directed that P200 million of these funds not be
disbursed, and none of the spending was documented according to law.