Postponing the 
			May 2020 Barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan Elections (BSKE) remains 
			inadequately justified, and will extend terms of office without 
			voters' consent
			A press statement by the 
			National Citizens’ Movement for Free Elections (NAMFREL)
			September 24, 2019
			The National Citizens’ 
			Movement for Free Elections (NAMFREL) reiterates its position that 
			the May 2020 Barangay and SK Elections be held as scheduled.
			Moving the date of the 
			BSKE:
			• Contravenes the 
			principle of regularity in the conduct of an election;
			• Extends the terms of 
			elected officials without a fresh mandate from the electorate;
			• Deprives the electorate 
			of seeking accountability from elected officials through the ballot.
			Periodic elections are an 
			institutionalized governance feature in countries that have chosen 
			democracy as their form of government. The Philippines has an 
			obligation under international law to conduct periodic and genuine 
			elections, as articulated in the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human 
			Rights and the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political 
			Rights (ICCPR). Further, the ICCPR stipulates that every citizen 
			must be provided the right and opportunity...to “vote and to be 
			elected at genuine periodic elections.” Thus, the regularity of 
			elections is important to establish the mandate, legitimacy and 
			moral authority of elected leaders. Not holding elections regularly 
			could undermine the democratic process of ensuring the citizens’ 
			right to choose their leaders and make them accountable.
			On postponing BSKE to save 
			P5 billion to P6 billion: Recent reports said that the country loses 
			P700 Billion annually due to corruption, P50 Billion annually due to 
			illegal wildlife trade, P105.7 Billion annually due to road crashes, 
			and P3.5 Billion daily due to traffic congestion in NCR alone, among 
			others. These reports indicate that the government can source enough 
			funds by addressing several key issues. Why do so at the expense of 
			a Constitution-mandated process?
			On postponing BSKE due to 
			election fatigue and not having enough time to prepare: The May 2020 
			BSKE comes a full year after the May 2019 elections. Preparations 
			for a manual election is not as complex and as time-pressured as 
			that of an automated one. The Comelec has acknowledged that they are 
			implementing the 2020 BSKE calendar and are in the thick of 
			preparations (ie. voter registration, outreach to IPs, voters’ 
			education, etc.). Comelec's request is just to not conduct the BSKE 
			at the same time or less than a year before or after national 
			elections.
			On postponing BSKE because 
			terms of office will be cut short: When the sitting barangay and SK 
			officials filed for their candidacy for the May 2018 BSKE, they were 
			fully aware of and accepted a shortened term, itself brought on by a 
			previous postponement of BSKE. NAMFREL believes that, instead of 
			length of term, a major determinant of success besides qualified and 
			committed elected local officials is the existence and proper 
			execution of concrete plans for the barangay, guided by established 
			guidelines and implementing rules and regulations. In the absence of 
			these, no amount of term extensions would ensure accomplishment of 
			expectations and deliverables. If they do a good job in their 
			shortened term, let their constituents judge them through the 
			election.
			Moreover, moving the date 
			of elections set by law can only be justified when any of the 
			conditions mentioned in Section 5 of the Philippine Omnibus Election 
			Code exist: any serious cause such as violence, terrorism, loss or 
			destruction of election paraphernalia or records, force majeure, and 
			other analogous causes of such a nature that the holding of a free, 
			orderly and honest election should become impossible in any 
			political subdivision. It is the task of the Commission on Elections 
			(Comelec) to make such determination, which in turn should be 
			through public hearings. None of these conditions exist, and no such 
			consultations with the voting public ever took place.