Reforms started by 
          Robredo crucial for nation-building
          By DILG-Office of Public 
          Affairs and MYLES JOSEPH COLASITO
          August 21, 2012
          Department of the Interior 
          and Local Government (DILG) Secretary Jesse Robredo has advanced 
          reforms in local government and the interior sector that are crucial 
          for the country’s “matuwid na daan”, government officials, lawmakers, 
          civil society organizations, the academe, urban poor groups, and other 
          supporters said on Sunday.
          
          
Sec. Robredo’s body has been 
          found this morning by search and rescue teams in Masbate City, ending 
          almost three days of waiting. He was on his way home to Naga City 
          after two speaking engagements in Cebu City, when the twin-engine 
          Piper Seneca aircraft he was on crash-landed off Bgy. Obingay, Masbate 
          City around 500 meters away from the airport runway.
          Fishermen rescued Sr. Police 
          Inspector Jun Abrazado after he lost consciousness trying to protect 
          the secretary, but Sec. Robredo and the two pilots unfortunately still 
          perished.
          Movement for Good Governance 
          chairperson Solita Monsod said it was crucial that the reforms Sec. 
          Robredo has begun be continued and that his replacement would make 
          sure that the ideals he fought for be protected.
          Up until the night before 
          his departure for Cebu, Sec. Robredo had been pushing his management 
          team to find more effective ways to advance reforms in local 
          governance and the interior sector. He was particularly focused on 
          drumming up public support for the Full Disclosure Policy (FDP), an 
          instrument that he hoped would advance transparency and accountability 
          in local governance.
          The FDP, the crown jewel of 
          Sec. Jesse’s work in local governance, requires LGUs to disclose in 
          public places 12 key financial documents that show how funds are 
          spent. As of June 2012, 1,697 or 99% of LGUs have complied with the 
          policy. This is validated by latest Pulse Asia and Social Weather 
          Stations surveys that show more Filipinos now observe transparency and 
          accountability in their localities. 
          
          The FDP is a requirement in 
          the conferment of the Seal of Good Housekeeping, which is awarded to 
          LGUs every year. The Seal of Good Housekeeping rewards honesty and 
          excellence in local governance. As of June 2012, 856 LGUs who have 
          qualified for the SGH have been granted P1.1 billion from the 
          Performance Challenge Fund – money that based on the guidelines are 
          spent for the poorest of the poor.
          “Lagi ko pong sinabi na 
          itinaas na natin ang antas o sukat ng paglilingkod. Hindi na sapat na 
          tayo ay matino lamang. Hindi rin sapat na tayo at mahusay lamang. 
          Hindi lahat ng matino ay mahusay, at lalo namang hindi lahat ng 
          mahusay ay matino. Ang dapat ay matino at mahusay upang karapat dapat 
          tayong pagkatiwalaan ng pera ng bayan,” the Secretary is fond of 
          saying.
          Last Friday, he wanted to 
          start an advocacy campaign so that ordinary citizens would use the 
          maximum benefits from the tool to demand good governance and 
          transparency from their local leaders. 
          
          In Eastern Visayas, DILG-8 
          Regional Director Pedro A. Noval Jr. said the office will offer a mass 
          for Robredo and his two companions. The DILG in its regional and field 
          offices will also fly its flag at half-mast in honor of the deceased 
          DILG Secretary. 
          
          “We grieve with the family 
          of Secretary Robredo. His death is a big loss to the DILG and the 
          cause of good governance,” said Dir. Noval. Secretary Robredo is 
          credited with initiating more participation, accountability, 
          responsiveness and transparency in both LGUs and in the Department 
          itself.
          In response to Secretary 
          Robredo’s prime advocacy, the FDP, DILG field personnel and local 
          officials in Region VIII collaborated in achieving 100% compliance to 
          FDP by all towns, cities and provinces in the region in the first 
          semester of 2012, up from a low compliance in 2011. 
          
          He also gave instructions 
          that illegal logging be stopped, and those involved be made 
          accountable.
          Sec. Robredo had also been 
          tirelessly improving disaster risk reduction and mitigation 
          capabilities of local government units across the country. He has 
          introduced the Seal of Disaster Preparedness, another incentive 
          mechanism to help LGUs deal with disasters and calamities. “The 
          important thing here is reducing casualties to zero,” he said.
          As of the first semester of 
          this year, 8,504 LGUs already have functional disaster management 
          councils. Exactly 1,539 have command centers and alarm systems. They 
          now have emergency response, rescue, and medical teams, and evacuation 
          centers.
          Having been a Mayor in Naga 
          City for 19 years, Sec. Robredo was strict about ensuring that each 
          LGU’s business process licensing system are streamlined and highly 
          effective. The Department committed to the Millennium Challenge Corp. 
          to streamline the BPLS of 120 LGUs in four years. As of June 2012, 748 
          LGUs have already streamlined their BPLS within a two-year period. 
          This has raised revenue collection by as much as 7% in Lapu-Lapu City 
          and 18% in Butuan City.
          The latest National 
          Competitiveness Survey results showed that 70% of businessmen 
          respondents received permits in three days or less. In fact, 17% did 
          so and less than two hours.
          Sec. Robredo believed that 
          measuring outcomes lead to improvement. He enhanced the Local 
          Governance Performance Management System (LGPMS), a tool to measure 
          LGU performance, by turning it into an assessment tool validated by 
          third-party assessment. This is a departure from the old system of 
          self-assessment.
          Consolidated results of the 
          LGPMS shows that there has been a consistent increase in the number of 
          LGUs with high overall performance ratings, from 913 in 2009 to 1,050 
          in 2010, to 1,261 in 2011.
          There has also been a 200% 
          leap in the number of LGUs that allow civil society organizations, 
          public organizations, the academe and religious groups to participate 
          in local governance. A concrete example of this is the DILG’s 
          partnership with the Ugnayan ng mga Barangay at Simbahan (UBAS) to 
          monitor LGU budgets and with Ateneo School of Government and De La 
          Salle University’s monitoring of public services in the local 
          governments.
          In ARMM, Sec. Robredo was 
          instrumental in the promotion of transparency and accountability among 
          local governments through the Seal of Good Housekeeping in ARMM. The 
          DILG is also on top of the reform program in ARMM with funding of 
          P8.59 billion.
          In the interior sector, Sec. 
          Robredo batted for a vision that every Filipino can walk the streets 
          unafraid 24x7. In 2011, crime rate went down 23.8%. Financial reforms 
          in the Philippine National Policy also led to the 54% increase in the 
          budget for field units to P1,000 per capital from P650. This means the 
          police have more funds for uniform, shoes, bullets and other needs. 
          Police visibility has also increased with the field deployment of 90% 
          of the police force, as opposed to 85% previously. 
          
          Through the Criminal 
          Investigation and Detection Group (CIDG), the DILG initiated 
          investigations and formally filed charges against individuals involved 
          in spurious procurement contracts.
          “Tatapatin ko po sainyo, 
          minsan mabigat sa dibdib ko ang gawaing ito. Subalit pag nakikita ko 
          po yung ordinaryong pulis sa kaduluduluhang istasyon, sinasabi ko po 
          sa aking sarili kailangan ko pong gawin ito para sa kanya. Ito na lang 
          po ang kaniyang pag-asa at magsilbing huwaran din na dapat ang matuwid 
          na daan ang syang dapat nating tahakin,” Sec. Robredo told officials 
          of the interior sector during his New Year’s Call early this year.
          Sec. Robredo declared just 
          last week that he intended to pursue all these reforms at whatever 
          cost, to ensure that the “matuwid na daan” of the President is well 
          lighted and easy to traverse for every citizen.
          “Pinapangako ko po na marami 
          pa tayong pakikinabangan sa mga repormang pinalakas natin sa DILG. 
          Paiigtingin pa natin ang pagbabago sa lokal na pamahalaan at sa 
          interior sector upang suportahan ang ginagawa nyo sa national. Sa 
          tulog ng opisyal at kawani ng DILG, gagawin ko ang lahat ng aking 
          makakaya para maabot natin ang pangarap ng isang bansang matuwid at 
          maayos ang daan,” reads his prepared statement for his upcoming 
          Commission on Appointments hearing.
 
 
 
 
Open Letter to President Benigno
          “Look Them 
          Straight in the Eye”
          By CHANDU CLAVER
          July 31, 2012
          Your much-acclaimed State of 
          the Nation Address, “Report Kay Boss,” last July 23 was a big 
          disappointment. On your third SONA, you never even mentioned the white 
          elephant in the room – the human rights situation in the Philippines.
          Human rights violation data 
          (Karapatan) show that during the Arroyo administration, there were 
          1,205 extra-judicial killings and 206 enforced disappearances. The 
          data also show that in the two years of your administration, there 
          were an additional documented 99 extra-judicial killings and 11 
          enforced disappearances.
          These cases do not include 
          the countless number of victims of threats, political vilification, 
          evacuations, torture, rape, and illegal detention. International human 
          rights bodies have similarly documented these violations. And there 
          was not a word of mention in that address. What does this mean, Mr. 
          President? Does this mean that the concerns of the families of these 
          victims of human rights violations are not important enough to merit 
          attention? Does this not fit your scenario of “where a citizen is 
          oppressed, he will find (you) an ally”? From your speech, I am 
          guessing that it does not. Does this mean that you are now tacitly in 
          agreement with these military terror tactics? 
          
          After two years of inaction 
          on your part, the families of the victims of the killings and 
          disappearances are now drawing that conclusion. In her 2006 SONA, then 
          President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo declared this sentiment when she 
          publicly praised General Jovito Palparan, a notorious human rights 
          violator. Right after your last SONA, you did a similar thing – you 
          designated the Morong 43 torturer Col. Aurelio Balabad to a division 
          command post. I am guessing that you are indeed encouraging these 
          terror tactics.
          Or does this also mean that 
          you are so afraid of the military that you dare not mention their dark 
          deeds? You talked tough against corrupt police officials coddled by 
          illegal loggers, but you were meek as a mouse about the bloody acts 
          arising from the military’s Oplans Bantay Laya and Bayanihan. I am 
          guessing that you do not truly believe that the people are your 
          “bosses” because, as I see it, you have higher bosses.
          As one of the families of 
          the victims of extra-judicial killings, and on the anniversary of the 
          killing of my wife, I challenge you to “look (us) in the eye” and tell 
          us that my guesses are wrong.
          Chandu Claver
          Husband of Alice Claver
          Extra-judicial Killing Victim (July 31, 2006)
          chandu_claver@yahoo.com
 
 
 
 
          The challenge of 
          adolescence
          
By 
          Fr. ROY CIMAGALA
          July 30, 2012
          Parents of teen-aged 
          children or those still in high school and early college are really up 
          to some tricky and difficult challenge these days. I am sure they 
          would prefer to tackle other kinds of problems than dealing with their 
          adolescent boys and girls who are in the middle of a dizzying process 
          of transformation in their lives.
          All of a sudden they 
          discover that their children are becoming independent-minded and even 
          rebellious, who like to stay out of the house most of the time to be 
          with their friends, and many times unmindful of schedules and other 
          responsibilities.
          Given the temper of the 
          times and the increasingly distracting character of the environment, 
          the challenge parents face with respect to these children has become 
          complex and complicated indeed.
          It’s imperative that parents 
          be adequately prepared to handle this situation. They should not take 
          this responsibility for granted. It certainly does no harm to them if 
          they attend regular parenting formative classes, since there’s always 
          need for reminders of basic things, let alone, keeping abreast with 
          pertinent current developments.
          For example, they need to 
          study the implications of the new things that are the common elements 
          in the adolescents’ lives today – the internet, other gadgets, malls, 
          fashions, the use of money and free time, etc. 
          
          Dealing with the adolescents 
          is definitely not a matter of controlling them. That is not the way to 
          bring them up properly. It is more a matter of guiding them, of being 
          with them to give them those timely pieces of advice, reminders, 
          suggestions and, yes, corrections. It’s a matter of motivating them to 
          use their freedom and their other talents and endowments correctly.
          Everyone passes through this 
          difficult stage, and so parents should readily understand what their 
          children are going through at this stage. Yes, they can draw from 
          their own experience, but they should also deeply realize that there 
          are new things that they really need to know so as to learn how to 
          handle them.
          In this regard, parents 
          should always make it a point to create an atmosphere of harmony at 
          home. The idea is to make the home bright and cheerful, never gloomy 
          and tense. Regular and naturally established moments of dialogue and 
          family conversation, in meals and family get-togethers for example, 
          are a must.
          It is in these moments that 
          the parents can closely monitor their children and listen to them so 
          as to understand them as well as to teach them. As much as possible, 
          these practices should become normal daily family activities, already 
          in place while the children are still young and very moldable. This 
          will prevent conflicts and war in the family when the children become 
          adolescents.
          Very crucial for the 
          children to understand as early as possible is the value of faith and 
          religion, the need for prayer, the sacraments and virtues, the 
          development of the proper sense of rights, duties and 
          responsibilities, etc. 
          
          Children have to know the 
          value of time, the vital and intrinsic relation between work, study 
          and rest. They have to learn how to deal with their emotions and 
          passions. They have to realize the organic connection between freedom 
          and responsibility.
          These have to be taught, of 
          course, in a gradual way, as in an inclined plane, always considering 
          the concrete conditions of the children and the circumstances of time 
          and place. In this regard, parents should be pro-active, taking the 
          initiative to plan the formative program of their children and not 
          wait for problems to arise before they move.
          This is all worth the 
          effort. There’s no bigger concern to the parents than the proper 
          upbringing of their children.
          Parents, of course, should 
          set good example first before they talk. Adolescents are most 
          sensitive and resentful when given lectures. But when they see their 
          parents walking their talk, they readily obey and follow. Actions 
          speaks louder than words.
          Parents have to know how to 
          tackle the relevant issues affecting their children – pornography, 
          laziness and idleness, complacency, consumerism and materialism, 
          affections and affairs of the heart, human sexuality, the ‘barkada,’ 
          etc.
          In this regard, a certain 
          firmness and clarity has to be exercised even if affection and 
          understanding should never be lacking.
          That’s why a good degree of 
          intimacy between parents and children should always be maintained and 
          developed. Parents should take the lead in this, always coming up with 
          initiatives – like planning excursions, eat-outs, fiestas, birthday 
          celebrations, etc., plus continuing personal chats. These things 
          should not be taken for granted.
          The art of motivating 
          children should be mastered. Children need constant affirmations of 
          parental love.
 
 
 
 
          The making of a 
          rampage killer
          
          
By
          Fr. ROY CIMAGALA, roycimagala@gmail.com
          July 26, 2012
          I find it intriguing that 
          the latest rampage killer in the US was described as a loner. Someone 
          commented that the other rampage killers before him were invariably 
          loners too.
          We now wonder why the US and 
          many other supposedly rich and developed countries in the West and 
          Australia seem to be breeding loners who turn out to be rampage 
          killers.
          It doesn’t mean that Asia, 
          Africa and the East in the general don’t have this kind of 
          individuals. There are many of them too in these places. But they are 
          usually described as ignorant fanatics, or at worst, religious or 
          political terrorists. Not so with their Western counterparts, who are 
          known to be educated and all that.
          Is there anything wrong then 
          with Western culture, or is it their current difficult social and 
          economic condition, that turns loners into rampage killers? I suppose 
          there are many reasons and factors that can enter into the explanation 
          of this very disturbing phenomenon.
          But we cannot discount the 
          fact that in these places, many broken and dysfunctional families, 
          children raised by single parents, and a good number of adults who 
          remain single and live alone, must contribute to the making of many 
          loners. They provide the elements that lead to horrible sicknesses, 
          mental, emotional, psychological, etc., that loners are most prone to.
          The unavoidable relations 
          made among them are hardly of the deep and enduring type. They are 
          most of the time just casual flings, made for merely practical 
          purposes and not anchored on any stable basis, principle or spirit.
          It’s really a pity that the 
          relations of people have turned out this way. But this could be 
          because many people do not know anymore what it is to be a person who 
          is supposed to be vitally connected with God and with others. 
          
          That a person is a rational, 
          intelligent individual meant to enter into relationship with God 
          first, his creator, and then with everybody else, his equal partners 
          in life, is lost on many people. A person is by definition meant for 
          love – to love God and others.
          For them, to be a person is 
          just to enjoy freedom without realizing where it comes from and how it 
          should be used. To be a person is simply to enjoy oneself, unmindful 
          of any external and objective law to govern him. They make themselves 
          their own law, or their own lawgiver, their own God. Selfish in 
          character, it’s a freedom that does feel the need for prayer, for 
          faith, etc.
          Freedom has become a captive 
          of a purely subjective interpretation, detached from its objective 
          source and not oriented to its proper goal. It most likely gets 
          entangled in the realm of the material and carnal, the pragmatic 
          considerations, etc. It hardly goes beyond that level. The spiritual, 
          the supernatural, the religious aspects are ignored.
          This is often the sickness 
          of liberalism that allows freedom to run wild on its own. It’s a 
          terrible disease because it gives the heady sensation that everything 
          is all right as long as one doesn’t inconvenience another. Any problem 
          can just be solved by some practical means that in themselves are also 
          very prone to manipulations and deceptions.
          One of the architects of 
          liberalism and its relative of utilitarianism – the attitude of 
          valuing things according to their usefulness to an individual – was 
          John Stuart Mill, a 19th century British philosopher who actively 
          batted for extreme individualism and even eccentricism.
          He certainly had a confused 
          understanding of how a person can be at the same time an individual 
          person and a social being, meant to enter into communion with God and 
          with others. He not only distinguished these two aspects of man’s 
          life, but rather separated them.
          In his book, “On Liberty,” 
          he wrote: “It is desirable that in things which do not primarily 
          concern others, individuality should assert itself.” These words 
          already show his tendency to contrast individuality and community.
          This attitude is reinforced 
          when he said in the same book, “Precisely because the tyranny of 
          opinion is such as to make eccentricity a reproach, it is desirable 
          that people should be eccentric.
          “Eccentricity has always 
          abounded when and where strength of character has abounded...That so 
          few now dare to be eccentric, marks the chief danger of the time.”
          This is a terrifying thought 
          that seems to enter into the ethos of Western culture. There is no 
          mention about God. It is just pure eccentricity that can be based on 
          anything. 
          
          This, I believe, is how 
          loners who can turn to be rampage killers are made.
 
 
 
 
          Basic argument for 
          the elimination of police torture
          A speech by Basil Fernando, 
          Director for Policy and Programme Development at the Asian Human 
          Rights Commission, Hong Kong. The speech was delivered at the Meeting 
          of Asian Parliamentarians in Hong Kong on the 22 July 2012, as part of 
          the Asian Alliance against Torture and Ill-treatment.
          What does police torture 
          mean?
          If we were to ask this 
          question, and then proceed to answer it, someone may ask in turn, 
          “Wait, how do you know?” It would take us into realms of epistemology: 
          “how do we know anything?”
          Such a question been asked 
          through the ages. And, one answer that has emerged in the last few 
          centuries is that one knows by the collection and observation of data. 
          Our age is symbolized by the images of the telescope and the 
          microscope. And today, we answer questions about what something means 
          through observation and analysis of data.
          What about the data on 
          torture?
          This data is present in the 
          actual stories of victims of torture. The approach of studying torture 
          through the stories of victims differs from the study of mere 
          statistics. Through stories accurately recorded, we can know what 
          torture is, why it happens, and answer all other associated questions.
          What does the known data on 
          torture tell us? What it tells us is of the contradictions in our 
          institutions. Observation and analysis of this data reveals to us the 
          malfunctioning of institutions, which defeat the possibility of 
          achieving rule of law. The study of torture thereby becomes a study of 
          the basic structure of key institutions in our societies, and their 
          peculiar defects.
          The data garnered from the 
          stories of victims reveals to us the utter stupidity of the way our 
          major institutions function. It follows that torture is not simply a 
          study of cruelty. Rather, it is more a study about the stupidity that 
          has become a part of the way our institutions function.
          Thus, asking a question like 
          “what is the meaning of torture?” is like asking the meaning of 
          pneumonia, malaria, or any other disease. Today, the methods of 
          studying such diseases have been well-established. The same principles 
          can be used to study the diseases that afflict our basic institutions.
          Democracy, without 
          functioning institutions, is a meaningless expression, an empty 
          balloon floating through space. Democracy, if it is to be meaningful, 
          is about functioning public institutions. The measure of 
          well-functioning institutions is the way such institutions are capable 
          of functioning under the rule of law. When a public institution is 
          dysfunctional, from the point of view of rule of law, it means that 
          such an institution has ceased to be an institution of democracy, and 
          has transformed into something else.
          In our societies, where 
          police torture is widespread, what we are experiencing are public 
          institutions which have become "something else." This "something else" 
          may have gone as far as totalitarianism, or it may be along the path 
          to such an "ism", but what we can be sure of is that such institutions 
          have not only become non-democratic, they have become an obstacle to 
          democracy.
          In countries where there is 
          widespread use of torture, there is also a belief, particularly among 
          the leaders and operators of public institutions, that policing 
          without torture is impossible. However, the opposite is a more direct 
          reflection of reality. When torture is a widespread practice, 
          policing, in its democratic sense, becomes impossible.
          The above reflections are on 
          the very basics of the discussions we have had yesterday.
          As for AHRC, such 
          discussions started almost fifteen years back. We have answered 
          questions by stubbornly continuing with the methodology of studying 
          torture via accurately recording stories of victims, day in and day 
          out. Our documentation is testimony to the pursuit of finding-out the 
          meaning of torture through such study of stories. Our maxim in our 
          early days was "go from micro to macro”, which meant “to know through 
          individual stories of torture the problems of the basic structure of 
          society."
          When we know about these 
          stories, the knowledge we have about the basic structure of our 
          societies is explained in a very different way to what it is normally 
          believed or declared to be.
          This is why the study of the 
          widespread practice of torture and the exposure of it is a vital part 
          of undoing what is wrong with the basic structure of our societies. It 
          is from this point of view that dealing with the issue of police 
          torture becomes an unavoidable task for anyone who is committed to the 
          pursuit of democracy in our societies.
          Elimination of police 
          torture is one of the most essential tasks in working towards 
          democratization of our societies. It is a practical way of getting 
          about undoing the institutional obstacles to democracy.
          It is this approach that the 
          Asian Human Rights Commission is presenting to the participants in 
          this meeting. And, in particular, AHRC is asking the legislators to 
          take this approach seriously in the strategies that they develop to 
          fight for the establishment of democracy.
          The elimination of torture 
          and the enabling of the freedom of speech are inseparably linked. When 
          the possibility of the practice of torture is reduced, if not fully 
          eliminated, the psychological conditions for the freedom of speech are 
          thereby created. And the core element of democracy is the freedom of 
          speech. It is through the freedom of speech that we are able to get 
          the views of many, if not all, and thereby develop a collective 
          consciousness with the participation of all. Thus, in the development 
          of civic sense and in the development of people’s participation, the 
          elimination of torture is an essential component.
 
 
 
 
          Remove the yoke of 
          injustice for political prisoners; Bishops support hunger strike
          A press statement by the 
          United Church of Christ in the Philippines
          July 19, 2012
          
          The kind of fasting that I want is this: remove the chains of 
          oppression and the yoke of injustice, and let the oppressed go free. 
          (Isaiah 58:6, Good News)
          We, Bishops of the United 
          Church of Christ in the Philippines, express our appreciation and 
          support for the on-going fasting/hunger strike by political prisoners 
          in the Philippines. In solidarity with the Filipino people who hunger 
          and thirst for justice and righteousness in our nation, we urge 
          President Benigno (Noynoy) Aquino III to consider the plight of 
          political detainees under his administration and their call for a 
          general, unconditional and omnibus amnesty.
          We find it deplorable that 
          presidential spokesperson Edwin Lacierda has even been published in 
          the Philippine Daily Inquirer (8 October 2011) saying, “we have no 
          political prisoners.” A mere glance at the list of 385 political 
          prisoners in the Philippines as provided by the Samahan ng 
          Ex-Detainees Laban sa Detensyon at Aresto (SELDA) makes it clear that 
          scores of people assert themselves as political prisoners in the 
          Philippines. In fact, 107 of these were newly detained during the 
          Aquino Administration. In the face of such callous dismissal by the 
          Aquino Administration, we are compelled to amplify the on-going hunger 
          strike of political prisoners. 
          
          The Universal Declaration of 
          Human Rights-Article 7 declares, “All are equal before the law and are 
          entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law;” 
          yet, these political prisoners uphold that they have been illegally 
          arrested, detained, and slapped with trumped-up criminal charges. Some 
          have executed affidavits of torture, inhumane treatment, and of being 
          forced to sign confessions under duress.
          We challenge President 
          Aquino to consider the release of political prisoners in the 
          Philippines, especially those with conspicuously trumped-up charges, 
          those with health ailments requiring medical care, and the elderly. 
          All of these may be accomplished through a general, unconditional and 
          omnibus amnesty. Then, it could truly be said that there are no 
          political prisoners in the Philippines.
          Likewise, we appeal for 
          President Aquino to consider the release of 14 National Democratic 
          Front Consultants, covered by JASIG. Their release was also agreed 
          upon by both the GPH and NDFP peace panels during the resumption of 
          talks in February 2011. As Church advocates committed to the peace 
          process, we view such action as a significant step in bringing forward 
          and revitalizing the GPH-NDFP peace talks.
          We hunger and thirst for 
          righteousness and we pray that the world will hear the plight of 
          Filipino political prisoners through their nation-wide fasting/hunger 
          strike.
           
          
           
          
           
          
           
          
          
          Unmet need for family planning?
          
          
          
By 
          Fr. ROY CIMAGALA, 
          roycimagala@gmail.com
          July 16, 2012
          
          
          This is another expression coined by population controllers busy 
          working in influential institutions like the UN. They define it as 
          “percentage of currently married women aged 15-49 who want to stop 
          having children or postpone the next pregnancy for at least two years, 
          but who are not using contraception.”
          
          
          Yes, it is just as cold as that. No further distinction is made, much 
          less, any mention of moral, ethical or cultural considerations. It 
          makes the illegal and automatic equation that women who don’t want to 
          get pregnant are the same women who want or should want to have 
          contraception. That’s foul!
          
          
          In short, it is all about unmet need for contraception, whether wanted 
          or not. Thus, this concept of unmet need is a license for population 
          controllers to indiscriminately spread the virus of the contraceptive 
          mentality all over the world.
          
          
          While many countries are suffering from all sorts of economic problems 
          and many other more basic needs, population controllers just focus on 
          making contraception available or actively pushing it, branding it as 
          the panacea for poverty and other women-related problems.
          
          
          And it is the so-called rich countries (we have to qualify it that 
          way, since many of them are actually now having tremendous economic 
          problems) that want to control the population of poor but bustling 
          countries, that are financing for this unmet need. These rich 
          countries seem threatened by the poor countries.
          
          
          They say that “contraceptives are one of the best investments a 
          country can make in its future.” They still talk about the so-called 
          “demographic dividend” that illegitimately equates fewer people with 
          higher development. Everyone knows that this is not necessarily so and 
          that, in fact, the reverse can be true.
          
          
          Some reports claim that the rich and famous of the world have donated 
          $2.6 billion recently in a summit in London to meet the “unmet need” 
          of 120 million women in the developing world for family planning.
          
          
          This looks to me like a lot of moolah just going down the sinkhole, a 
          pure waste of precious resources, when there are many other more 
          important needs that require both immediate help and sustained 
          support.
          
          
          For example, Austin Ruse, the president of the Catholic Family and 
          Human Rights Institute (C-FAM), a non-profit institute that closely 
          follows the United Nations and other organizations on family and 
          population issues, claims that the real needs of women in many places 
          are still unmet: basic medical care, skilled birth attendants, 
          education, clean water, and nutrition.”
          
          
          He also claims that many countries are now facing a demographic winter 
          where there is already a notable population decline, where older 
          people are outnumbering the younger population, where deaths are 
          getting higher than births.
          
          
          He noted that even in Muslim countries that are long known to have big 
          population, a significant fertility decline is already taking place. 
          It seems they also are succumbing to the contraceptive mentality.
          
          
          Here in our country a CNN report recently observed that while many 
          other Asian countries are experiencing some economic slowdown, we are 
          having an economic surge instead.
          
          
          Economists attribute it to many factors, like a recovery of 
          electronics exports after a decline in demand last year, a strong 
          domestic consumption due to the money sent home to the Philippines by 
          its overseas workers, and the rise of outsourced call centers that 
          serve as the long-term stabilizers relatively unhindered by a sagging 
          global economy.
          
          
          According to Haz Narvaez, Manila-based head of research for the 
          Philippines at the Credit-Suisse, it is estimated that 11% of the 92 
          million Filipinos work overseas, and their remittances account for 
          about 10% of the country’s GDP, totaling $225 billion in 1991.
          
          
          Since these Filipino overseas work often as domestic workers, nurses 
          or skilled technicians or in jobs that are less vulnerable during 
          global economic slumps, they can continue working and sending money to 
          our country.
          
          
          Narvaez said, “You have an aging population in the West, and you have 
          a young population here in the Philippines waiting to do jobs that 
          some people in the West are not willing to do.” This must explain why 
          our overseas workers continue to find jobs abroad and support our 
          country significantly and rather stably.
          
          
          We should be wary when we hear some political leaders talk about the 
          RH Bill because this is pure baloney. The RH Bill has no other purpose 
          than to integrate the contraceptive mentality and the population 
          control program into our country.
          
          
          Let’s not be deceived by claims about women’s reproductive rights, 
          demographic dividends and unmet need for contraception. To me they are 
          decoys of the devil, not to mention, rotten fruits of bad thinking