The latest news in Eastern Visayas region

 
 
more news...
 
Village official in Samar shot dead

KARAPATAN-Panay SecGen. ambushed, 2 other human rights defenders abducted

Tanauan riders rule national Skimboarding competition

Samar mussel industry welcomes its godfather

Ormoc revenue district officer chosen most outstanding in the country

Military arrests top Leyte NPA leader

Ombudsman warns public officials: Government vehicles are banned during Holy Week

DTI eyes Samar as Tahong Capital

Food for School Program benefits 5,905 Leyte grade I pupils this summer

NCAE should not be mandatory

 
 

 

 

 

LCP seeks to nullify 6 cityhood laws at the Supreme Court

Press Release
By League of Cities of the
Philippines
April 14, 2007


Under threat !

MANILA, Philippines  –  The 118-strong League of Cities of the Philippines (LCP), led by Iloilo City Mayor Jerry P. Treñas and Calbayog City Mayor Mel Senen S. Sarmiento, LCP President and Secretary General, respectively, filed a petition before the Supreme Court on Tuesday (March 27) to declare null and void the cityhood laws of six towns.

The towns which include Baybay, Leyte; Bogo, Cebu; Catbalogan, Samar; Tandag, Agusan del Sur; Borongan, Eastern Samar; and, Tayabas, Quezon were named respondents to the petition for violating Section 10, Article X and Section 1, Article III of the 1987 Constitution.

LCP has designated Puno and Puno Law Office to file the petition for prohibition in its behalf as well as the request for the issuance of a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) against the conduct of a plebiscite in the said towns.

Treñas said the towns failed to meet the requirements provided for under the Local Government Code which technically disqualifies them from conversion into cities.

The cityhood bills lapsed into law after the President failed to sign them 30 days after they were submitted to Malacañang.  Despite failing to meet the requirements of Republic Act 9009, these were still passed by Congress.

Under RA 9009, a town should have a locally generated income of at least P100 million annually before it could be classified into a city.  It should also either have a land area of at least 100 square kilometers or a population of 150,000.

The League argued that the cityhood laws violated Section 10, Article X of the 1987 Constitution by unlawful exemption of these towns from complying with the minimum income requirement imposed by the Local Government Code.

Treñas further stated that the cityhood laws also violate the equal protection clause under Section 1, Article III of the Constitution as it unreasonably grants special treatment to these municipalities by exempting them from compliance with the minimum income requirement impose by the Local Government Code.

The six are part of the 16 towns which sought exemption from the requirements of RA 9009. The Congress has so far approved the cityhood laws of the 15 towns despite strong opposition from the LCP.

Sarmiento said the conversion of these “unqualified” towns into cities will set a “bad precedent” and shall invite a deluge of application practically from all towns which have the same status. He said that LCP will be filing similar suits against the other towns as their cityhood bills lapse into law.